Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | BMC Plant Biology

Fig. 5

From: Saving time maintaining reliability: a new method for quantification of Tetranychus urticae damage in Arabidopsis whole rosettes

Fig. 5

Area selection accuracy on two lighting conditions and backgrounds. The identification of damaged areas by the two software’s that has the best accuracy (Ilastik and Assess), is assessed using the standard (Photoshop, top row). Results are shown for the brightest conditions on both backgrounds: w3 (white background, middle row) and b3 (black background, lower row). Damaged areas are represented by red colour (Assess and Photoshop) and black colour (Ilastik). Lighting conditions (brightness, contrast for each case): w3 and b3 (40,-20 White; 50,-10 Black, respectively). Black scale bar indicates 1 cm

Back to article page

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us